Blog

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Breaking down ACP-77: Reinventing Subnets on Avalanche.
We demystify Avalanche's crucial proposal, ACP-77, and why it matters.
July 26, 2024
5 min read

The Avalanche Foundation has unveiled ACP-77, a transformative proposal set to redefine subnet creation and operation within the Avalanche blockchain ecosystem. This ambitious initiative aims to lower entry barriers, enhance flexibility, and foster a more decentralized and dynamic network environment. Here, we delve into the intricacies of ACP-77, exploring its current context, proposed changes, benefits, and potential challenges.

-> Note, as part of the ACP-77 proposal, 'Subnets' will be known as 'Avalanche L1s (Layer 1s).'

The Current Landscape of Subnets

Subnets and Their Role: In the Avalanche ecosystem, subnets function as independent blockchains that leverage the mainnet for interoperability. However, the existing requirements for subnet validation have created significant hurdles for developers.

The Cost Barrier: Currently, validators of subnets must also validate the Avalanche mainnet, necessitating a minimum stake of 2,000 AVAX. At today's rates, this amounts to a substantial financial commitment, approximately $70,000. This high cost deters many developers that aim to jumpstart their subnet by running their own validators, stifling innovation and limiting the expansion of the subnet ecosystem.

Key Proposals of ACP-77

ACP-77 introduces a series of pivotal changes designed to overhaul the subnet creation process, making it more accessible and efficient.

1. Decoupling Subnet and Mainnet Validation:

  • Current Requirement: Validators must validate both the subnet and the mainnet, involving a high financial stake.
  • Proposed Change: Subnet validators will no longer be required to validate the mainnet. This separation allows subnet creators to define their own validator sets and operational logic, significantly reducing costs.

2. Enhanced Validator Set Management:

  • Autonomy for Subnets: Subnet creators will gain the ability to establish their own rules for validator sets, staking rewards, and operational conditions. This autonomy empowers developers to tailor their subnet operations to their specific needs and goals.

3. P-Chain Fee Mechanism:

  • Service Payments: Subnet validators will pay the P-Chain for services such as validator set changes and cross-subnet communication.
  • Continuous Balance Depletion: Avalanche L1s will have balances on the P-chain that deplete continuously, requiring periodic refills to maintain operations. This ensures an ongoing contribution to the network’s overall functionality and security.

4. Streamlined Synchronization:

  • Current Process: Validators must sync with the entire mainnet, which can be resource-intensive.
  • Proposed Process: Validators will only need to sync with the P-Chain, reducing resource requirements and streamlining the validation process.

Benefits of ACP-77

The proposed changes in ACP-77 bring several significant benefits to the Avalanche network and its developers.

1. Lower Costs and Increased Accessibility:

  • Reduced Financial Barriers: By removing the 2,000 AVAX requirement, ACP-77 makes the creation of L1s and maintenance far more affordable. This democratization of subnet access is poised to unlock a wave of innovation and participation within the ecosystem.

2. Greater Flexibility and Autonomy:

  • Customizable Operations: Subnet creators can now define their own validator rules, staking rewards, and operational conditions. This flexibility allows for highly customized and optimized subnet operations, tailored to specific project needs.

3. Incentives for Decentralization:

  • Promoting Decentralized Models: The new framework encourages projects to adopt more decentralized, permissionless models. This shift towards decentralization enhances the resilience and diversity of the network.

4. Enhanced Security and Interoperability:

  • Self-Regulated Security: Subnets will be responsible for their own security and validator integrity allowing even for restaking solutions as an example, promoting better self-regulation and robust security practices.
  • Seamless Interoperability: Through Avalanche Warp Messaging (AWM), subnets will enjoy improved interoperability, facilitating smoother communication and collaboration across the network.

Potential Challenges and Considerations

While ACP-77 promises numerous benefits, it also introduces certain challenges that need to be addressed.

1. Economic Implications:

  • Impact on AVAX Tokenomics: The changes in validator requirements could affect the overall AVAX holdings among subnet validators, influencing the tokenomics and market dynamics of AVAX. Careful analysis and management will be needed to maintain balance and stability.

2. Implementation Complexity:

  • Transition Challenges: The shift to new validation models and the continuous fee mechanism introduces complexity in implementation. L1 operators will need to adapt to new cost structures and operational protocols, which may require significant adjustments and planning.

Final Word

ACP-77 represents a bold and forward-thinking step in the evolution of the Avalanche network. By lowering financial barriers, enhancing flexibility, and promoting decentralization, this proposal has the potential to unlock unprecedented growth and innovation within the subnet ecosystem. While challenges remain, the careful implementation of ACP-77 could pave the way for a more accessible, dynamic, and resilient Avalanche network, fostering a new era of blockchain development and collaboration.

About Chorus One

Chorus One is one of the biggest institutional staking providers globally, operating infrastructure for 60+ Proof-of-Stake networks, including Ethereum, Cosmos, Solana, Avalanche, and Near, amongst others. Since 2018, we have been at the forefront of the PoS industry and now offer easy enterprise-grade staking solutions, industry-leading research, and also invest in some of the most cutting-edge protocols through Chorus Ventures. We are a team of over 50 passionate individuals spread throughout the globe who believe in the transformative power of blockchain technology.

TON Series #2: The mechanisms of staking TON
An overview of TON staking mecahnisms - including Nominator Pools, Single Nominator Pool, and Liquid Staking
July 16, 2024
5 min read

In Part 2 of our TON Series, we dive into TON’s staking mechanisms. We'll cover the what, why, and how of staking TON, as well as how to get started easily with Chorus One.

An introduction to TON Staking

TON leverages the Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus algorithm, a system where validators are responsible for proposing and validating new blocks of transactions. In TON's PoS model, validators are selected through a competitive election process to ensure the highest levels of security and performance.

The Election and Validation Process

The election process is central to TON staking. During each consensus round, potential validators submit their applications along with their stake and other parameters, which determines the level of maintenance they are willing to perform. The Elector governance contract evaluates these applications, selecting validators based on their stake and parameters, aiming to maximize the network's overall stake.

Once selected, validators enter a validation cycle, as depicted in the timeline diagram below:

Source: https://docs.ton.org/develop/howto/blockchain-configs#examples

Key Phases of the Validation Cycle:

  1. Election (6-7 hours): Candidates apply to become validators.
  2. Delay (2-3 hours): A brief waiting period before validation starts.
  3. Validation (18 hours): Validators approve transactions and propose new blocks.
  4. Hold (9 hours): Validators prepare for the next cycle.

To ensure continuous network operation, TON employs two types of pools—odd and even—which operate in alternating cycles, providing seamless validation without interruptions.

Minimum stake

To be eligible for the validator election process, validators need a minimum stake of

300,000 TON. Validators stake Toncoin for a fixed specific term, and the stake is refunded with interest after the completion of a validation round.

Validator rewards

Each transaction on TON requires a computation fee called gas used to conduct network storage and the transaction processing on-chain. Like most blockchain networks, on TON, these fees are accumulated within the Elector contract in a reward pool. 50% of fees users pay are burnt and 50% goes to validators.

The network also subsidizes block creation by adding a subsidy to the reward pool equal to 1.7 TON for each block in the main chain, called masterchain. TON’s architecture allows for the creation of parallel chains, called  workchains. For workchain blocks,  the reward per block is set to 1 TON. The network has an inflation rate of approximately 0.3-0.6% annually.

How does TON staking work?

TON offers several staking mechanisms to cater to different needs and preferences. Let's explore these options:

  1. Nominator Pool

The Nominator Pool is central in TON's staking ecosystem, offering a collaborative approach to staking that allows multiple users to pool their Toncoin (TON) tokens and collectively participate in the network's validation process. This pooling mechanism is designed to democratize staking, making it accessible to a broader range of participants who may not have sufficient tokens to meet the minimum staking requirements individually.

The Nominator Pool enables a group of up to 40 nominators (stakers) to combine their staking power and delegate it to a validator like Chorus One. This collective staking approach not only helps in meeting the high minimum staking thresholds but also ensures that the network remains secure and robust by leveraging the combined resources of multiple stakeholders.

Source: https://github.com/orbs-network/single-nominator

How the Nominator Pool Works:

  1. A nominator joins the pool by staking a minimum of 10,000 TON tokens.
  2. The pool collectively stakes the combined tokens through a validator. The operator managing the validator must stake at least 1,000 TON tokens which are used to protect against bad behavior.
  3. The Election Process starts: During the election phase, which lasts between 6 to 7 hours, the pool’s validator submits an application for validation, along with the combined stake from all nominators.
  4. Delay Period: After the election, there is a delay of 2 to 3 hours before the validation phase begins.
  5. Validation Cycle: The validator then participates in an 18-hour validation cycle, during which they propose and validate new blocks of transactions.
  6. Reward Distribution: At the end of each validation cycle, the rewards earned are distributed among the nominators based on the proportion of their stake in the pool.
  7. To access their rewards, nominators need to send a transaction of 1 TON to the pool with a specific comment, which triggers the return of their entire stake and earned rewards.
  8. Withdrawal: Nominators can withdraw their entire stake and rewards in one transaction. Partial withdrawals are not supported via this mechanism, necessitating a complete withdrawal of funds when accessing rewards.

To visualize the Nominator Pool workflow, consider the following diagram:

This workflow ensures continuous network validation, with odd and even pools alternating their validation cycles to maintain seamless operation and security of the TON blockchain.

Pros and Cons of the Nominator Pool

Pros:

  • Relatively low effort to set up, with support from validators like Chorus One
  • Allows multiple nominators to pool resources, making it easier to meet staking thresholds.
  • Automatically handles proportional reward distribution.

Cons:

  • The minimum staking requirements might exclude investors with less than 10,000 TON.
  • Only allows full withdrawals, which can be restrictive for nominators needing partial access to their funds.
  • Utilizes a hot wallet for operational fees, posing potential security risks.

2. Single Nominator Pools

The Single Nominator Pool is a streamlined and secure staking mechanism within the TON ecosystem, designed specifically for validators who have sufficient TON to stake independently (aka solo stakers). This approach reduces complexity and enhances security by focusing on a single nominator, making it an ideal choice for those who prefer a more straightforward staking process.

The Single Nominator Pool allows a single entity to manage the staking process, providing a simplified and secure framework for validators. By eliminating the need for multiple nominators, this mechanism significantly reduces the attack surface, making it easier to safeguard the staked assets.

Source:https://github.com/orbs-network/single-nominator

How the Single Nominator Pool Works

  1. A Single Nominator Pool is deployed by a validator like Chorus One.
  2. Only one nominator, who is also the pool owner, stakes their TON tokens. The single nominator can stake any amount of TON which should meet the protocol minimum requirement (currently 300,000 TON tokens).
  3. The nominator applies for validation by submitting their stake during the election period (6-7 hours).
  4. After the election, a delay of 2-3 hours occurs before the validation phase begins.
  5. The validator participates in an 18-hour validation cycle, validating transactions and proposing new blocks.
  6. All rewards generated during the validation cycle are directed to the single nominator.
  • Flexible Withdrawals: The nominator can withdraw any amount of their stake and rewards, offering greater flexibility compared to multi-nominator pools.
  1. The pool uses a cold wallet to store the principal staking funds, significantly reducing the risk of theft.
  2. Hot Wallet Operations: The validator uses a hot wallet to manage operational fees, ensuring that the cold wallet remains secure.

To illustrate the workflow of the Single Nominator Pool, consider the following diagram:

This simplified workflow highlights the continuous cycle of election, delay, validation, and hold phases, ensuring the seamless operation and security of the TON blockchain.

Pros and Cons of the Single Nominator Pool

Pros:

  • Easy to deploy and manage a single nominator pool.
  • Reduced attack surface via the use of a cold wallet for principal funds.
  • Allows partial withdrawals, providing greater flexibility for the nominator.

Cons:

  • Not suitable for groups or multiple nominators with smaller holdings of TON tokens.
  • Doesn’t support distribution of rewards between validator and nominator, requiring technical expertise from nominator to operate the pool, or off-chain payments.
  • All operations rely on the single nominator, which can be a limitation for shared or community-based staking.

The Single Nominator Pool offers a secure and efficient staking solution for individual validators, combining simplicity with enhanced security measures. By focusing on a single participant, this mechanism ensures that the staking process is straightforward and easy to manage, making it an attractive option for those looking to stake their TON independently.

3. Liquid staking

Liquid Staking protocols enable TON holders to participate in staking pools, lending their funds to validators at a predetermined interest rate. In return, stakers receive liquid staking receipt tokens, known as Pool Jettons, which represent their share in the pool. These tokens can be exchanged back for TON at any time, allowing stakers to maintain liquidity while earning rewards.

The protocol is user-agnostic, accommodating users of all capital sizes without any minimum or maximum stake requirements.

Source: https://ton-ls-protocol.gitbook.io/ton-liquid-staking-protocol

How TON Liquid Staking Works

  1. Users stake their TON in a pool managed by the Liquid Staking Contract.
  2. Upon staking, users receive Pool Jettons, which are liquid staking receipt tokens representing their share of the pool. These tokens ensure that users can maintain liquidity and withdraw their staked assets whenever needed.
  1. Staked funds are lent to validators, who use them for participating in the network’s validation process. Validators are chosen based on their stake and maintenance parameters during election phase, followed by a validation cycle.
  2. During each 36-hour validation cycle, validators earn rewards, which are distributed proportionally to all participants in the pool.
  3. Rewards come from interest payments made by validators who borrow the staked funds. The value of Pool Jettons increases as rewards are distributed, reflecting the growing stake in the pool.
  4. Users can deposit and withdraw their assets at any time without any predefined limits, managed through specialized smart contracts that ensure accurate accounting and security.

Pros and Cons of TON Liquid Staking

Pros:

  • User-agnostic design makes it suitable for all users, regardless of their stake size or technical expertise.
  • Allows partial and full withdrawals at any time, providing liquidity to stakers.

Cons:

  • Higher effort required for deployment and management due to the use of multiple smart contracts and DAOs.
  • Reliance on various smart contracts can increase the risk of vulnerabilities, necessitating rigorous audits and security measures.

The Liquid Staking Contract offers a versatile and powerful staking solution on the TON blockchain, combining the benefits of liquidity, decentralization, and accessibility. By understanding and leveraging this mechanism, users can participate in network validation more flexibly and securely, contributing to the overall stability and growth of the TON ecosystem.

Staking TON with Chorus One

Chorus One offers white-label TON validator services for institutional customers, as well as deployment and management of nominator pools. We can create nominator pools for our customers, requiring a minimum delegation of 300,000 TON tokens (TONcoin).

As the operator, Chorus One takes full responsibility for the operational fees, maintenance, and performance of the validator, ensuring seamless and efficient service.

Ready to get started, or want to learn more?

Fill this form - https://chorusone.my.salesforce-sites.com/WebToLead

OR

Email us - staking@chorus.one

About Chorus One

Chorus One is one of the biggest institutional staking providers globally, operating infrastructure for 50+ Proof-of-Stake networks, including Ethereum, Cosmos, Solana, Avalanche, and Near, amongst others. Since 2018, we have been at the forefront of the PoS industry and now offer easy enterprise-grade staking solutions, industry-leading research, and also invest in some of the most cutting-edge protocols through Chorus Ventures. We are a team of over 50 passionate individuals spread throughout the globe who believe in the transformative power of blockchain technology.

TON Series #1: Exploring TON Space, Mini Apps, Native Stablecoin payments, and more.
We explore some of the most unique innovations within the TON (The Open Network) ecosystem, and why they matter
July 4, 2024
5 min read

The rise of TON (The Open Network) has been spectacular, driven by its seamless integration with Telegram and remarkable price performance, reaching new all-time highs in June 2024. Its native token, Toncoin ($TON), has achieved a market cap of $17 billion and a total value locked (TVL) of over 660 million at the time of writing.

This year, the network has gained tremendous traction, becoming the preferred solution for Web3 integration with Telegram, which reportedly has over 900 million users worldwide.

Key developments fueling TON's rapid adoption include the global launch of TON Space, a self-hosted digital wallet (Telegram Wallet), a strategic partnership with Tencent to create a ‘Super App Eco-platform,’ and the launch of native stablecoin payments. Major investors like Pantera Capital have also highlighted TON’s scalability and extensive user base, comparing its potential to that of Solana or Ethereum and claiming TON as one of the most exciting and unique blockchains in existence today.

Source: https://defillama.com/chain/TON (as of Jul 4, 2024)

Below, we explore some of the most unique innovations within the TON ecosystem. 👇

  1. The Telegram Wallet and TON Space: Easy Onboarding, Simplifying service payments and fund transfers
Source: https://wallet.tg/ton

The Telegram Wallet, introduced in the fall of 2023, is a versatile tool for managing digital currencies directly within the Telegram messaging app. It offers both custodial and non-custodial options, giving users the flexibility to choose between having Telegram manage their keys or maintaining full control themselves.

TON Space, a novel feature within the Telegram Wallet, serves as its non-custodial component. It allows users to store, send, receive, and exchange various cryptocurrencies, including Toncoin, Bitcoin, and stablecoins, all within the app. Users can back up their wallets using Telegram and their email, eliminating the need to remember a seed phrase. Additionally, users can track their portfolio in real-time and receive transaction notifications.

Why this matters:

The key advantage of TON Space is its seamless integration with Telegram, providing easy access to funds, quick transactions with contacts, as well as enhanced security and flexibility for experienced users. Its integration with Telegram bots and services allows for efficient market updates, trading actions, and service payments, all in one place.

TON Space simplifies digital asset management, making it accessible to a broader audience while offering advanced features for experienced users. By combining the convenience of a messaging app with the functionality of a comprehensive wallet, TON Space aims to drive mass adoption of cryptocurrency, potentially increasing the user base to 500 million by 2028.

To understand how to choose the right wallet for your TON assets here, visit: https://www.coingecko.com/learn/top-ton-wallets-jettons-crypto

Source: https://x.com/ton_blockchain/status/1702293212017074279
  1. A truly scalable ecosystem with a highly performative blockchain

TON capitalizes on the messaging app's extensive user base to create a network capable of supporting a wide range of applications. Its ecosystem comprises the TON Blockchain, TON Storage, TON DNS, and TON Services, all designed to work seamlessly together.

At the core of TON is its blockchain, built for high performance and scalability. Its dynamic sharding mechanism enables the network to process millions of transactions per second, scaling efficiently as the user base expands.

Dynamic sharding is TON's key feature for achieving high scalability. The ability to shard into individual chains (work chains and shard chains) allows TON to "distribute" transactions, effectively removing the bottleneck of processing transactions on a single blockchain. Learn more about how TON’s dynamic sharding works here.

Why this Matters:

TON’s multifaceted services extend beyond traditional blockchain functionality, aiming to establish a foundational Web3 platform. By integrating various decentralized services within a single ecosystem, TON provides the infrastructure necessary for a decentralized internet, positioning itself as a significant player in the evolution of digital infrastructure. Additionally, TON’s highly scalable blockchain offers an ideal platform for developers looking to deploy applications for a large audience without compromising on speed or security.

TON’s dynamic sharding enables a scalable network for millions of users. Source: https://panteracapital.com/blog-investing-in-ton-network/

  1. Mini Apps - TON’s native support for off-chain scaling

Over 360 million users engage monthly with Telegram's “Mini Apps,” including chatbots and mini-games which are easily accessible via the TON Space. These TON-based applications leverage TON’s innovative support for payment channel technology (or Lightning Network) designed for fast off-chain transactions, efficiently handling microtransactions and high-frequency trading.

Why this Matters:

TON’s native support for off-chain scaling and the lightning network design addresses the scalability trilemma more effectively than bolt-on solutions. It allows the blockchain to handle high-frequency, low-value transactions, which are essential for the mainstream adoption of blockchain technology.

Currently, there are over 300 projects on TON, with most building mini-apps accessible via the Telegram Apps Center. Earlier this year, memecoin trading tools like BonkBot leveraging this technology generated millions of dollars in revenue through Telegram’s interface. TON-based applications such as StormTrade now enable users to trade perpetuals, cryptocurrencies, stocks, and equities using the same platform. With StormTrade facilitating over $10 million in daily trading volume, similar TON-native Telegram bots are poised to become the preferred user experience for many traders.

  1. Native Stablecoin payments

On April 19th, 2024, Tether announced the deployment of a stablecoin, USDt, on the TON blockchain and in Wallet in Telegram. This development represents a significant advancement for the industry, allowing hundreds of millions of users to seamlessly send and receive stablecoins through the Telegram platform, making payments as easy as using Venmo or Apple Cash.

Additionally, as part of the TON network’s scalability plan, straight from Telegram Wallet, users can transfer USDt to i) contacts or other Telegram users; and ii) their own or others’ addresses in the TON blockchain for a very low fee (currently ~0.005 TON), making it a very convenient and competitive platform for small businesses and services.

Why this Matters:

For the TON community, integrating USDt into Wallet in Telegram significantly improves the transaction experience. Users benefit from free transfers within Telegram and only pay network fees when transacting on-chain, using TON space or other self-custodial wallets. USDt on TON also provides an accessible entry point for newcomers to cryptocurrencies, combining the advantages of digital currencies with the stability of traditional fiat currencies.

In fact, the supply of USDT stablecoin on the TON network crossed 500 million after two months of rollout, reflecting a high demand for this use-case.

Stablecoin payments on TON (Source: https://panteracapital.com/blog-investing-in-ton-network/ )

TON Economics: Is TON the new SOL?

Even when transacting on-chain, the TON blockchain is relatively cheap. Employing a gas based model, simple transactions’ fee currently averages 0.005 TON, or $0.04 at the time of writing when $TON was priced at $8. At this level, TON positions itself as a potential competitor to Solana - although TON’s scalability has not yet been tested as extensively.

Inflation rate in the protocol is 0.5% per year - considerably small compared to other blockchains. To compensate for that, all network participants are rewarded from both transaction fees and block rewards. As a consequence, users are incentivized to stake their TONcoin to secure the network and directly benefit from network adoption. The biggest advantage lies in keeping assets staked on-chain rather than with external parties offering a fixed APY, e.g. centralized exchanges. As part of a deflationary mechanism, 50% of all TONcoin collected in fees is burnt.

TON Staking

TON relies on the DPoS consensus mechanism with a set of validators who propose and validate new blocks. The validator set is determined by the Elector governance smart contract, which allocates new rounds based on each validator's weight, represented by the amount of tokens delegated to them.

Staking is one of the safest and most predictable ways to earn rewards in the crypto space, as the value originates from the blockchain’s native currency inflation, making it forecastable.

By staking your TON, you help secure the network and earn rewards. Chorus One is the leading enterprise-grade staking platform, enabling institutional customers to stake TON and integrate TON staking functionality into their offerings. We are ready to closely collaborate and contribute to the success of the TON ecosystem, and provide the best staking experience possible.

How to stake TON?

Reach out to us if you are an institution looking to stake TON with Chorus One.

About Chorus One

Chorus One is one of the biggest institutional staking providers globally, operating infrastructure for 50+ Proof-of-Stake networks, including Ethereum, Cosmos, Solana, Avalanche, and Near, amongst others. Since 2018, we have been at the forefront of the PoS industry and now offer easy enterprise-grade staking solutions, industry-leading research, and also invest in some of the most cutting-edge protocols through Chorus Ventures. We are a team of over 50 passionate individuals spread throughout the globe who believe in the transformative power of blockchain technology.

The evolution of shared security
We examine the various approaches to shared security, including Restaking, Bitcoin Staking, Rollups (L2's), and Inter-chain security (Cosmos)
June 28, 2024
5 min read

This article is extracted from the Q1 2024 Quarterly Insights. To read the full report, please visit https://chorus.one/reports-research/quarterly-network-insights-q1-2024

Authors: Michael Moser, Umberto Natale, Gabriella Sofia, Thalita Franklin, Luis Nuñez Clavijo

On PoS networks, the financial aspect of staking is equivalent to the computational power committed on PoW networks. If we were to make an analogy with PoW, shared security could be compared to “merge mining”, a mechanism that allows a miner to mine a block in one blockchain, by solving the cryptographic challenge on another chain.

As a generalization, shared security technologies imply, at least, one security provider chain and, at least, one security consumer chain. To guarantee security, the shared security solution must allow for misbehavior in either the provider or consumer chains to be penalized, and that can be even by slashing the capital used for security of the provider chains. Different approaches are being used to optimize for the specific needs of each ecosystem. We will review the approaches most advanced in terms of development, and highlight the incentives and risks associated with the adoption of those technologies.

Although one may argue that Ethereum has pioneered the concept of shared security with L2s - like Arbitrum and Optimism, other blockchains have been exploring “the appchain thesis” and experimenting with more customized solutions:

  • On Avalanche, validators of the Primary Chain need to stake AVAX and they can participate on “Subnets” - a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of blockchains. Each blockchain is validated by exactly one Subnet. A Subnet can validate arbitrarily many blockchains. A node may be a member of arbitrarilymany Subnets.
  • On Polkadot, validators are staked on the Relay Chain in DOT and validate for the Relay Chain. Parachain auctions are held on the Polkadot Relay Chain to determine which blockchain will connect to the parachain slot. Parachains connected to the Polkadot Relay Chain all share in the security of the Relay Chain.
  • On Cosmos, the Interchain Security stack allows for new L1 chains to rent security from the Cosmos Hub as a way to lower the barrier to economic security. This is accomplished by the validator set of the Cosmos Hub running the consumer chain's nodes as well, and being subject to penalties (“slashing”) of the stake deposited on the Hub.

The motivation behind shared security is twofold:

  • It reduces the complexity for launching new chains, repurposing battle-tested security from well-established chains and decreasing or even removing the need for building a validator set from scratch, and;
  • It improves capital efficiency, allowing individuals to participate and be rewarded in multiple PoS chains, without the need to deploy additional capital.

Rollups

Rollups solutions are the main contenders for Layer 2 (“L2”) scalability in the Ethereum (the “L1”) path to modularity. This strategy allows the execution, in terms of computation and memory, to be processed “off the main chain”. The settlement properties of the state are kept on the L1 chain, which pools the security of the ecosystem through its validator base, and “rolled” from the L2 in batches (thus the name “rollup”).

This aggregation of transactions helps to minimize execution costs for each individual transaction. To maintain an ordered control of the state and upcoming transactions, rollups can make use of different architectures: historically we’ve seen a growing trend of optimistic (e.g. Arbitrum, OP, Base) or zero-knowledge (“ZK”, e.g. Starknet, Scroll) rollups, both of which have achieved limited levels of maturity in their proving mechanisms.

New architectures or upgraded versions of past ideas have also taken flight in the past months. Validiums have been brought backto the spotlight with new developments such as X Layer, and a particular flavor deemed “Optimium” (that uses the OP stack) now powers contenders such as Mantle, Mode Network, Metis, etc. The innovation, however, continues to thrive. The idea of “Based rollups” was first introduced in March by lead EF researcher Justin Drake,a simple design that allows L2 sequencing to be defined by L1 validators in their proposed blocks, thus deepening the shared security model between the layers.

It is safe to say that the rollup ecosystem continues to be the leading product in the shared security environment, with a TVL of $45.49  billion (counting canonically bridged, externally bridged, and natively minted tokens). In the last 180 days, transactions per second on the rollups have dwarfed activity on Ethereum mainnet, and the number of active users (considering distinct wallets) has risen meteorically in comparison to the L1.

EigenLayer

The idea behind shared security has captured extraordinary attention with EigenLayer, the restaking protocol built on Ethereum that has become a leading narrative within the network’s large staking  community.  In fact, restaking might as well become a larger sector than even the entire industry of single-asset staking. Driven by growing demand from stakers (seeking increased returns on their investments) and developers (sourcing security), the industry is witnessing an unprecedented shake up with capital flowing to secure multiple chains in aggregate. Concretely, EigenLayer’s TVL has managed to reach the 5 million ETH milestone at the time of writing.

Since we first identified restaking as a fundamental trend in our Q1 2023 edition, we’ve discussed EigenLayer at length and become deeply invested in the future success of the protocol: our research has focused on finding optimal risk-reward baskets for AVSs - total risk is not simply a combination of linear risks, but needs to take correlations into account.

As a result of our experience on the Holesky testnet and as mainnet operators for several AVSs, we publicized our approach to AVS selection. The thesis is straightforward: to identify and onboard the AVSs that have chances of being break-out winners, while filtering out the long tail of AVSs that merely introduce complexity and risk.

Much of what’s left to flesh out has to do with reward mechanisms and slashing conditions in these restaking protocols. As EigenLayer and other shared security models evolve and reach maturity, more information surfaces. Most recently, the Eigen Labs team presented their solution for the slashing dilemma (at least partially): $EIGEN. Current staking tokens have limitations in a model such as the AVS standard, due to the attributable nature of the slashing conditionson Ethereum. In other words, ETH can only secure work thatis provable on-chain. And since AVSs are by definition exogenous to the protocol, they are not attributable to capital on Ethereum.

Enter $EIGEN, the nominal “universal intersubjective work token” that intends to address agreed faults that are not internally provable. The slashing agreements under this classification should not be handled through the ETH restaked pool (as they necessitate a governance mechanism to determine their validity) but this second token, thus fulfilling the dual staking promise that the team had previously outlined. Currently, EigenDA is in its first phase of implementing this dual-quorum solution, and users can restake and delegate both ETH and EIGEN to the EigenDA operators.

ICS: replicated and mesh security

Replicated security went live on the Cosmos Hub in March 2023as the initial version of the Interchain Security protocol (“ICS”). Through this system, other Cosmos chains can apply to get the entire security of the Cosmos Hub validator set. This is accomplished by the validator set of the Cosmos Hub running the consumer chain's nodes as well, and being subject to slashing for downtime or double signing. Inter-Blockchain Communication (“IBC”) is utilized to relay updates of validator stake from the provider to the consumer chain so that the consumer chain knows which validators can produce blocks.

Currently, all Cosmos Hub validators secure the consumer chains. Under discussion is the “opt-in security” or ICS v2, an evolution of the above, that allows validators to choose to secure specific consumer chains or not. Another long-awaited feature is the ability for a consumer chain to get security from multiple provider chains. Both, however, introduce security and scaling issues. For example, the validator set of a consumer chain secured by multiple providers can have poor performance, since it will grow too large.

Solving most of the concerns around Replicated Security, Mesh Security was presented by Sunny Agarwal, the co-founder of Osmosis, in September 2022. The main insight is that instead of using the validator set of a provider chain to secure a consumer chain, delegators on one blockchain can be allowed to restake their staked assets to secure another Cosmos chain, and vice versa...

With Mesh Security, operators can choose whether to run a Cosmos chain and enable features to accept staked assets from another Cosmos chain, thereby increasing the economic security of the first one. This approach allows one chain to provide and consume security simultaneously.

BabylonChain

BabylonChain uses Bitcoin’s economic value to secure PoS chains. Specifically, Bitcoin has several properties that make it particularly for economic security purposes, prominently its large market cap, and beyond this, the fact that it is unencumbered, less volatile, and generally idle and fairly distributed.

Staking is not a native feature of the Bitcoin blockchain. Babylon implements a remote staking mechanism on top of Bitcoin’s UTXO model, which allows the recipient of a transaction to spend a specific amount of coins specified by the sender. In this way, a staking contract can be generated that allows for four operations: staking, slashing, unbonding, and claiming coins after they have been unbonded. 


Blocks are processed natively on the PoS chain using BabylonChain for security first, and then in a second round, validators provide finality by signing again using so-called extractable one-time signatures (EOTS). The central feature of this key type is that whena signer signs two messages using the same private key, it is leaked.

Therefore, if a validator signs two conflicting blocks at the same time, the corresponding private key is leaked, allowing anybody to exit the staked BTC through a burn transaction.  

Separately, BabylonChain protects against so-called long-range attacks by timestamping, where the PoS chain’s block hashes are committed to the Bitcoin chain. Such an attacked would occur when a staker unbonds but is still able to vote on blocks, i.e. could attack a chain costlessly. Through timestamping, the set of stakers on Bitcoin is synchronized with the blocks of the PoS chain, precluding a long-range attack.

No one-size-fits all approach

When exploring the evolution of different solutions to shared security, it becomes clear that it improves one of the dimensions of security in PoS chains - the financial commitment behind a network, resulting in a higher cost of corruption, or the minimum cost incurred by any adversary for successfully executing a safety or liveness attack on the protocols. As a natural challenge to modularity, some networks are born with optimized solutions to how different projects would be able to leverage a validator set. That is the case for Avalanche and Polkadot, for example. On the other side, there are solutions being built as an additional layer on top of existing networks, like EigenLayer and Babylon. And there is the Cosmos ICS, which leverages IBC, and is modular enough to not form part of either of the previous two groups.

In the set of analyzed projects, two categories emerged: restaking and checkpointing. The former aims to unlock liquidity in the ecosystems, while the latter works as an additional layer of security to a protocol, without directly changing the dynamics for stakers nor node operators. In the end, those projects also have secondary effects on the networks. For example, restaking reduces the need for scaling the validator set in the Cosmos, while checkpointing has the potential to minimize the unbonding period for stakers.

Shared security can also change the economic incentives to operate a network. Particularly related to restaking, the final rewards for validating multiple networks are expected to be higher than validating only one. However, as always, return scales with risk. Shared security can compromise on the decentralization dimension of security, opening the doors to higher levels of contagiousness during stress scenarios, and it also adds new implementation and smart contract risk.
In the context of decentralized networks, shared security is the idea of increasing the economic security of a blockchain through the use of resources from another - one or multiple - networks.

Shared security can also change the economic incentives to operate a network. Particularly related to restaking, the final rewards for validating multiple networks are expected to be higher than validating only one. However, as always, return scales with risk. Shared security can compromise on the decentralization dimension of security, opening the doors to higher levels of contagiousness during stress scenarios, and it also adds new implementation and smart contract risk.

About Chorus One

Chorus One is one of the biggest institutional staking providers globally, operating infrastructure for 50+ Proof-of-Stake networks, including Ethereum, Cosmos, Solana, Avalanche, and Near, amongst others. Since 2018, we have been at the forefront of the PoS industry and now offer easy enterprise-grade staking solutions, industry-leading research, and also invest in some of the most cutting-edge protocols through Chorus Ventures. We are a team of over 50 passionate individuals spread throughout the globe who believe in the transformative power of blockchain technology.

 Join our mailing list to receive our latest updates, research reports, and industry news.

Thanks for subscribing. Watch out for us in your inbox.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Want to be a guest?
Drop us a line!

Submit
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.